I love Twitter and use it and follow a bunch people, but I'm not sure what to make of Twitter in the sense of how "important" it is.
Is it the next email? (by which I mean life/work transforming killer app, not something that has been horribly abused by spammers) Doubtful. Email, for those of us that remember when email became part of our lives, really changed the way we worked and kept in touch with people we knew.
Twitter is not that revolutionary, though it has allowed be to befriend and converse with people I've never met and know little about (other than what I've picked up via Twitter).
Ten years from now, what will we be saying about Twitter? I think that's one way to think about the potential importance of Twitter.
Email is so useful, that despite it's flaws, it will still be here in ten years. Twitter? I doubt it, particularly if it can't address it's stability and downtime issues. Something better will come along and replace it.
Will Twitter ever reach the critical mass that email has? Doubtful again. How many people can you follow in Twitter before so much scrolls by that you never see? If more and more people use it, the streaming nature of Twitter will work against it.
Email lets you deal with it at your own pace. Emails don't go anywhere. Technically, neither do tweets, but the nature of tweets is in the now. Two day old tweets are... not interesting. Two day old emails may be interesting, depending on what they are.
What, fundamentally, is the purpose of Twitter? You tell me:
- Vital communication tool
- Way to keep in touch with friends
- Way to feel connected to a virtual community
- Instant vanity publishing
- Strange combination of communication and instant gratification
- Way to waste time by watching other people's lives
- All of the above
5 comments:
Tony,
We are definitely on the same page. Twitter is great for virtually communicating w/ friend and co-workers but if you miss tweets for a few days who cares. Turn it off, walk away and forget it. It's great enjoyment during down times, but when your swamped and really busy it can be quite a distraction.
I have gotten value out of it by being able to bounce ideas, virtually chat, and just share junk socially but it's not a MUST have channel by any means.
I think if we're going to compare twitter to anything, it should be IM. I also think it needs to get more than 1% of the population on it before we talk about it being the next killer anything :-)
I would vote that it is a way to feel part of a virtual community in the here and now.
Tony, you are dead on when you say that a tweet from two days ago is old news. The micro-blogging that Twitter was/is supposed to be has turn into more of a bunch of short conversations, which makes those tweets from two days go old. It doesn't make much sense for someone a couple of days from now to jump in with a reply to a tweet.
Maybe I'm following the wrong people (apologies to the people I'm following) but I have yet to see anything resembling what I consider a "conversation." I know who ate a pickle, whose shoe is untied (again), and who is listening to THE SHINS. Problem is: I don't care. Are people using Twitter to say something meaningful? I'm all for "imagined identity" but so far, I'm unconvinced. Yes, it's a lot like IM - which I can also do from my phone. So why tweet? I'll give it some more time...but I'm not feeling the love. Yet.
I also know people who have said that they received some visibility with the press as a result of being on Twitter.
I presume that this is because they wrote some interesting tweets that someone retweeted.
Post a Comment